Select language, opens an overlay

Comments (43)

What did you think about this title?
1 to 25 of 43 items
Content warning. Some content has been marked as offensive or a spoiler.
Jan 24, 2024satnam108 rated this title 0.5 out of 5 stars
Completely weird. This added zero benefit to my life. And My guess is that Julianne Moore was doing a caricature of Lindsey Lohan for her role. I donnt recommend wasting your time with this one.
Nov 20, 2023jimg2000 rated this title 4 out of 5 stars
Feb 14, 2016 Agree with prescura_0's comment and, while the film was largely on outrageous characters unique to the Hollywood star culture, the genetic disorder angle was what made the film most shockin.
Nov 08, 2023
Very trippy movie. I liked it.
Oct 03, 2022ExistentialJeny0_0 rated this title 4.5 out of 5 stars
While some moments seem like satire, particularly Julianne Moore's character, or the young child actor, Cronenberg has said in an interview that the writer claims all he'd mentioned in the script was things he'd actually seen or heard in…
Feb 20, 2022richmole rated this title 1 out of 5 stars
Grotesque. Question: would you spend any time with these characters in real life? No? Then...why spend any time with them in front of your TV screen? Well, perhaps if there's something really edifying in telling this story. Think not.
Sep 24, 2021
Absolute caca. Burning next to a pool? And in a very bad CGI. If you're looking for a good movie with a bad burning individual effect, there's Le Retour de Martin Guerre.
Jul 20, 2021ausnos rated this title 0.5 out of 5 stars
I only saw this movie because Julianne Moore was in it, but it sucks. None of the characters were appealing and the story, if one could call it that, is forgettable.
Dec 05, 2020knighted rated this title 1.5 out of 5 stars
You can save yourself one hour by imagining of picking 2-3 “ famous” people from instagram add one those Disney young stars too and you got a movie . Make things interesting too add some gore or let them fight each-other and ta da you made…
Sep 04, 2018amanoletters99 rated this title 1 out of 5 stars
And the point of this film was???? ( ) exactly!
Jul 09, 2017DW6377 rated this title 1 out of 5 stars
Not a fan of this one :(
Mar 16, 2017MICHAEL TAGGART MALONEY rated this title 5 out of 5 stars
Contrary to many of the comments left here I think this is one of the more accessible of Cronenberg's films. It is an exploration of our dead-end Hollywood culture in all its filth and depravity. The Bruce Wagner script is a revelation.…
comment flagged as spoiler
Feb 24, 2017
This content is flagged as a spoiler
Oct 02, 2016PHILLIP GARY SMITH rated this title 3.5 out of 5 stars
The dark world of moviedom finds itself on center stage with the psychotic, crazy and otherwise screwed-up characters in Maps to the Stars. The actors are so believable that one forgets it's a story. Even wealth and adoration as a movie…
Aug 19, 2016Maoisdead rated this title 0.5 out of 5 stars
At first I thought this was a parody of a bad movie ( because of the poor acting, dialogue, etc. )- but then I realized - No! It's just a bad movie. I advise you skip this flic even if you're a Cronenberg fan.
Aug 03, 2016
I'm resisting the urge to rhapsodize because I understand how widely the opinions differ on which of David Cronenberg's films belong in the greatness category & which ones were just stinkers & sinkers. I'd experienced a lot of…
Jul 01, 2016No_Stalkers4Me rated this title 2.5 out of 5 stars
One of the strangest stories I've ever seen put to film ... lukewarm "recommendation". OK if you're in the mood for Indie & odd.
May 20, 2016lukasevansherman rated this title 2.5 out of 5 stars
"I love this movie more than I love my own mustache."-John Waters. I wish I could agree with Waters, but I'd file this under interesting failure. David Cronenberg is one of the most consistently provocative filmmakers and I generally like…
Apr 29, 2016sewells65 rated this title 0.5 out of 5 stars
Terrible flick. Huge waste of my time.
NeoRauch
Apr 12, 2016NeoRauch rated this title 0.5 out of 5 stars
Awful, awful movie with no redeeming qualities whatsoever- It boggles the mind how such an acclaimed director such as David Cronenberg could make such a bad movie.
Apr 06, 2016AkMis rated this title 4 out of 5 stars
Wanted to check it out because it was a Cronenberg film with Cusask, then I find Julliane Moore( with an outstanding performance), and the wonderful Mia Wasikowska is in it too. Intense and engaging. Loved it.
Mar 23, 2016Marzipan50 rated this title 4 out of 5 stars
I found this movie very entertaining. I think some of it is probably realistic to what happens to actors in Hollywood. Julianne Moore was especially great in it.
Feb 21, 2016Monolith rated this title 0.5 out of 5 stars
I have ZERO desire to spend my time with spoiled, pampered, self-centered, whining psychos, but that sums up the almost two hours of this Cronenberg fiasco. The pièce de résistance was Julianne Moore straining to pinch a loaf.
Jan 26, 2016Doublena rated this title 1 out of 5 stars
We made it to the 30 minute mark, and wished we could get our 30 mins back to do something else, ...anything else! Please don't waste your time with this movie.
Happy_24
Dec 14, 2015Happy_24 rated this title 0.5 out of 5 stars
Trying so hard to be deep where no depth exists.
Oct 19, 2015uncommonreader rated this title 0.5 out of 5 stars
This is an unwatchable movie. What happened to Cronenburg?